🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.